Services
Initiation and processing of amparo lawsuits against decisions issued by competition authorities and regulatory agencies (such as COFECE, IFT, CRE, and CNH) that affect the interests of private parties.
Initiation and processing of amparo lawsuits against general norms (laws, regulations, regulatory provisions, and general administrative provisions, among others) with the aim of removing them from the complainant’s legal sphere.
General advisory related to sectorial regulations (including, among others, the regulation of the electricity, port, telecommunications, pharmaceutical sectors, etc.) with the purpose of assisting our clients in complying with their sectorial obligations.
Representation in amparo lawsuits to defend the constitutionality of an act when our clients have benefited from a regulator’s decision that has been challenged by a third party.
Filing of administrative challenges – when requested by our clients – through the appropriate appeal, whether administrative or judicial, as deemed appropriate.
Preliminary analysis of regulations and acts of authority, as well as the development of comprehensive defense strategies, including, among others, negotiations with public or private entities, filing complaints with regulatory authorities, and challenging before administrative and judicial instances.
Experience
We have an in-depth knowledge of the jurisprudential evolution thanks to our experience at the defunct Federal Competition Commission and COFECE. We led the defense in key cases that established the current jurisdictional criteria in economic competition, telecommunications, broadcasting, and other regulated sectors (e.g., energy, hydrocarbons, ports, telecommunications, etc.). Among these cases, we achieved the recognition of the attorney-client privilege in competition law in Mexico.
Success stories
- Administrative Litigation
- Energy
Amparo lawsuits against CRE’s inaction in the hydrocarbons sector
- Administrative Litigation
- Energy
